EN 50126 · CENELEC RAMS

Living Safety Cases for Rail

A risk matrix built to EN 50126's own worked example, live fault-sequence bowtie diagrams, and safety measure requirements linked straight to SIL.

Book an Engineering Walkthrough Interactive Bowtie Demo ↗
πŸ“Š

An EN 50126 Risk Matrix Built to the Standard's Own Worked Example

Rather than a generic "typical" risk matrix, SAFOPS's rail template is built to BS EN 50126-1's own Annex C, Table C.9 risk acceptance categories — adjustable to your own scheme's specific bands. Each new rail project starts from this matrix as a reviewable baseline. Every cell of the shipped matrix is checked against the published table, and an automated consistency check keeps the template and its example projects from drifting apart.

βš™οΈ

Risk Category Drives the SIL Requirement

A fault landing in Tolerable, Undesirable, or Intolerable automatically carries the safety integrity requirement the standard implies for it β€” so a safety measure requirement is never silently missing just because a category was renamed or a matrix was rebuilt. Requirements feed the Protection and Engineering Schedules automatically, with proof-test intervals carried alongside the SIL they justify, and change impact analysis shows which requirements a proposed change would break.

πŸ•ΈοΈ

Interactive Bowtie Diagrams and a Living Hazard Record

Initiating events, preventative and mitigative barriers, and consequences are modelled as interactive bowtie diagrams you can click, drag, and zoom through β€” hover any barrier to see its zone of influence and open deficiencies directly on the diagram, not in a separate tracker. The same model doubles as your hazard record: every safety requirement traces back to the hazard it controls, with the evidence of closure EN 50126 expects.

🀝

Software, With Safety Engineers Behind It

You don't have to adopt SAFOPS alone. Our safety engineers can do the work in the platform for you β€” performing the hazard identification and risk assessments, building and managing the hazard record, and keeping requirement closure evidenced through the project lifecycle β€” from a one-off migration of a legacy hazard log to ongoing management alongside your independent assessor. Use SAFOPS as a tool, a fully managed service, or anything in between.

Ready to build your first Living Safety Case?

Book an Engineering Walkthrough Interactive Bowtie Demo ↗