Before you downgrade, replace, or retire a safety measure, know exactly which fault sequences depend on it — and whether removing it would actually break a requirement.
One click simulates removing a physical safety system — every credited instance of it, across every fault sequence it protects — and re-runs the exact same Safety Measure Requirements logic the Protection Schedule already uses. No AI involved, nothing approximated: the same rules, just asked a hypothetical question.
A safety measure shared across several fault sequences (a common utility, a shared alarm system) is exactly the kind of dependency that's invisible in a flat table but obvious once the tool actually traces it. If removing a measure would flip any fault's requirement from met to not-met, you see it immediately — by fault, by exposure group, with the reason — before you ever make the change for real.
If nothing would break, SAFOPS tells you that too — a clean result is exactly as informative as catching a problem, and just as fast to get.