Beyond Rigid Spreadsheets
A 6×6 matrix isn't right for everyone. SAFOPS lets a project define its own exposure groups, matrix dimensions, frequency bands, and consequence bands to match your own methodology — set once at project initiation, editable later without a schema migration.
Quantitative & Qualitative — Same Engine
Support for strict numeric frequency constraints (a computed sum against fixed or program-tailorable thresholds) or direct engineering judgment (pick "Occasional" vs "Improbable" yourself, goal-based-standard style) — both run through the identical categorisation engine, so switching methodology never means switching tools.
Eight Starting Points, Not a Blank Page
Every new project starts from a real, reviewable template — pick one and adjust it, rather than building a matrix from scratch:
- Nuclear — ONR SAPs style, 4 exposure groups, Class 1-3 PFD/PFH reliability ladder.
- Aviation — ARP 4761/AC 25.1309 style, computed probability vs. fixed severity thresholds.
- Defence (Def Stan 00-56) — goal-based, direct-judgment frequency, no fixed numeric ladder.
- Defence (MIL-STD-882E) — program-tailorable Risk Assessment Code matrix.
- Rail — EN 50126/Yellow Book ALARP tolerability, SIL 1-4 PFH-based requirements.
- Automotive — simplified ISO 26262-style ASIL triage.
- Cyber Risk — ISO 27005/NIST SP 800-30 style, scored across Confidentiality/Integrity/Availability.
- Oil & Gas — ISO 17776/IOGP style, scored across Personnel/Environment/Asset, SIL 1-3 SIF requirements.